Senegal’s Prime Minister Questions President Faye’s Stance on Political Funds

Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko has publicly disagreed with President Bassirou Diomaye Faye over the management of political funds, reigniting a long-standing debate that has divided the government since 2019. While Sonko insists on strict transparency measures, he maintains that these funds should remain in place, creating a rift within the executive branch.

Disagreement Over Political Funds Management

During an interview at the Palais de la République on May 2, President Bassirou Diomaye Faye defended the existence of political funds, acknowledging their sensitive nature regarding transparency. He argued that these funds are essential for intelligence operations, national security, international solidarity commitments, and state obligations, stating: « Political funds cover expenditures that cannot be disclosed to the public. »

Prime Minister Sonko countered this position, emphasizing that transparency must be enforced. « Political funds were part of our electoral promises, » he stated. « I disagree with President Faye—he made a mistake. I trust he will correct his stance. » He traced the debate back to 2019, when his party first raised concerns about the lack of oversight on these funds, asserting that public funds should never evade scrutiny.

Calls for Strict Oversight, Not Abolition

While Sonko does not advocate for the elimination of political funds, he demands rigorous controls similar to those in France. « We are not calling for their removal, but for strict regulation, » he clarified. Highlighting his own role as head of government, he revealed that the Prime Minister’s Office currently manages 1.77 billion in political funds, stressing that citizens reject any possibility of these funds being misused for personal gain or political patronage.

Sonko reinforced his commitment to accountability, declaring: « Every public fund must be subject to oversight—no exceptions. » He also addressed legislative efforts underway, criticizing the idea of legislative-led reform. « When I learned that a deputy was preparing a bill on this, I told the president it would be a failure if the legislature took the lead, » he explained. « This is an executive promise—I will submit the proposal to the Council of Ministers if necessary. »