Senegal constitutional reform referendum pdS urges voters to reject changes
The Senegalese Democratic Party (PDS), led by Karim Wade, has taken a firm stance on the proposed constitutional reform referendum. While acknowledging President Bassirou Diomaye Faye’s decision to seek public input through a national vote, the party has called for a decisive ‘No’ vote and leveled sharp criticism at opposition leader Ousmane Sonko.
In a statement released earlier this week, the PDS praised the president’s commitment to democratic consultation but warned that the constitutional amendments pose a threat to Senegal’s institutional stability. The party argues that the reforms, if approved, could undermine the very foundations of the republic’s governance framework.
Why the PDS opposes the constitutional changes
The PDS contends that the proposed revisions are driven by personal ambitions rather than national interest, with Ousmane Sonko at the center of these alleged motives. The party asserts that Sonko’s political maneuvers aim to destabilize Senegal’s democratic institutions, a claim it frames as a deliberate attempt to reshape governance for partisan gains.
Beyond institutional concerns, the PDS accuses Sonko of exacerbating the country’s economic and social challenges, further destabilizing the nation. The party’s statement underscores a belief that the reforms would erode public trust in democracy and disrupt the balance of power established by Senegal’s constitutional order.
Calls for judicial and presidential action
The PDS has urged President Bassirou Diomaye Faye and judicial authorities to take decisive steps to protect Senegal’s institutions, civil peace, and public freedoms. The party also condemned recent violence targeting opposition figures, specifically citing the alleged assault on Deputy Abdou Mbow during parliamentary clashes, which it blames on members of Sonko’s party, Pastef.
This bold declaration amplifies ongoing political tensions surrounding the referendum, as Senegal’s political landscape remains deeply divided over the proposed constitutional amendments.
