Congo opposition vows to challenge constitutional changes
The Constitutional Court’s endorsement of the referendum framework has reignited fierce debates over potential constitutional amendments in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. While authorities view this as a legal milestone, opposition factions warn of a dangerous slide toward authoritarianism and pledge to escalate their resistance.
The coalition Article 64 has condemned the decision, arguing it paves the way for constitutional reform—something they categorically reject. Prince Epenge, a spokesperson for the group, delivered a defiant message to supporters: “We will not back down. We will pool our strength and energy to ensure this law never takes effect in our nation.”
Epenge emphasized the public’s outrage, urging citizens to “stand firm, remain mobilized, and resolutely reject both a third term and the country’s fragmentation.”
Kinshasa residents voice growing unease
As coalition leaders gathered to strategize, residents in the capital expressed deep concern over the escalating political tensions. Many fear that renewed protests could disrupt daily life and spiral into violence.
One resident questioned, “Will their demands be pursued peacefully?” stressing the need to “avoid any loss of life.”
Another voiced apprehension that “the political climate in the DRC could deteriorate further following this ruling.”
A third resident accused the ruling administration of “sowing chaos, frequently deploying agents to disrupt opposition marches.”
“The real victims will be ordinary citizens,” another added, “when protests erupt.”
Political dialogue at risk of collapse
Timo Roujean, an analyst with the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, warned that swift presidential approval of the law could poison the political environment. He cautioned that if President Félix Tshisekedi signs the bill before August 15, efforts to foster dialogue may collapse entirely.
Roujean highlighted the rising tensions, noting that discussions about a potential constitutional coup have already surfaced. He cautioned that the court’s decision could embolden factions advocating violent resistance, stating: “In an increasingly tense climate, this ruling risks validating the narrative that armed opposition is the only way to challenge the government.”
The court’s verdict has done little to resolve the impasse. With the presidential camp now armed with a legal framework and the opposition vowing to block constitutional changes, the coming weeks will be critical in determining the trajectory of the DRC’s political crisis.
